Viewing entries by
Philippe Lewis

The Myth of Instant Intimacy

Comment

Share

The Myth of Instant Intimacy

Along with the free love culture of the 60's and the new-age/neo-tantra culture that came afterward came the idea of "instant-intimacy"

The idea that we can quickly form intimate bonds with one another. 

Eventually, apps like Tinder, Bumble, OK Cupid, and countless speed dating, tantra retreats, play parties, and other relational and group experiences came to answer the call of what humans appear to desire above all else: connection.

And it slowly started to make sense: faced with ease of living wherever we are called and an ever greater source of intimate partners via social media and apps like Feeld and Grindr as well as a multiplicity of relational non-monogamous models, the world began to explore what is possible like the proverbial kid in the candy store.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Share

The Human / Leader Paradox

Comment

Share

The Human / Leader Paradox

We love when a leader shows superhuman abilities. It tells us that they have earned their place as a leader because they can indeed show up better than we can and better than we can.

But it always seems to turn out to be a lie.

Leaders may have great abilities (or just charisma) but it's always anyone's guess how far they have learned to master the power given to them by their role.

Abilities (and the right mentors) offer some capacity to use power well, but only experience can truly lead to mastery... if such experience doesn't lead to downfall first.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Share

When Responsibility Meets Accountability

Comment

Share

When Responsibility Meets Accountability

"How have you abused your power?
How have you abused your power?
How have you abused your power?"

At first, in my mind's eye, I was speaking loudly to someone I had experienced as clearly abusing their power, and as I was doing so, I knew full well that I eventually would need to answer as if I was sitting in their shoes.

Except I didn't, not exactly.

I was doing an aspecting session, and in one such a session it is only with me, myself, and I—and any and all archetypes willing to show up. I speak as one, and then I move to the other side of the pillow and I answer as another.

(click the title to read more)

Comment

Share

The Importance of Darkness

Comment

Share

The Importance of Darkness

(I wrote this a few years ago after a mediation I went through with someone in another community)

Whenever we witness a conflict between two people, one of the most difficult things to do is to establish what is actually happening between them.

Mostly, it’s impossible.

You might be unlucky enough to speak to one person first and hear them speak of the other person in the most demonizing ways they can. And this will play into any biases you already have about any group they might appear to be a part of.

What happens when the person being demonized is a man? How easy is it to perceive them according to the new narratives emerging about them? About us?

I’ve spent 30 years digging deep into myself around this, from the time I was with my first and second girlfriend, both having been assaulted and abused by men. And during these years, I explored not only the ways there might be such a dangerous man inside of me, but also the ways he might be inside of other men.

30 years of exploring my own misandry.

Because yes, we men are capable of such things.

But not because we are men.

Over the years, I learned that violence, awfulness, and abuse are not just the domain of men, they are the domain of humans.

And women are just as capable of such things. It may look different, but there’s no less primal and tribal capacity for such things in them. Not that the current narrative about women would allow you to see this. No, patriarchy is all about men… and those who raised them. Right?

Everyone can be awful. Or awful to each other. And the more I explore the nature of conflict, the more I realize this. Whatever the reasons are--self-preservation, safety, reason, protection, morality, purpose, etc--we are capable of exacting really awful things on each other even while we believe we are doing good or well or right or simply the best we can.

The mistake we make is to believe we have risen above this limbic pit.

We haven’t.

All I can say is this: conflict arises when we can’t find a better way, when we don’t understand, when we’re mislead, when we’re unable to really get what’s happening on the other side. So we make assumptions. We judge. We call out. We dismiss. We hate. We demonize. We abandon all hope and throw away the key.

And the result is, we go deeper into our judgment that the other person is *so* other that they are no longer allowed to exist. Or be. Or have their own life where they get to find their way back to the light from whatever dark mess they found themselves in. From whatever mess WE found ourselves in.

Because we aren’t any better. At one point or another we have been or will be in the same place, where others will demonize us and say they are correct about our demon blood, and we’ll hopefully remember that this--their view--is just a small window into our world, that there’s a whole lot more to us than they believe. And if we’ve been in the muck before, we’ll just thank them, acknowledge our darkness, and ask them to show us their demons.

And we’ll finally see each other as we hate each other.

But if we don’t kill each other then, there will be one more step. The impossible step.

Hate and love--or at least compassion, understanding, and generosity-- aren’t that different from one another, but it’s a bit of a mind and heart fuck. It’s available when we know their darkness and our darkness isn’t that different even though it is unique and personal. Their suffering and our suffering. Their shadows and our shadows.

This is why the path of mediation works.

Because it allows us to go beyond the competition of “what happened” into the messy reality of how it felt, how it messed with us, and of how it happened in the first place if the mystery of it isn’t so deep in our shadows that we can bear to feel into the truth of who we were and probably still are in it.

Because the path of mediation is a path of intimacy with those we would rather keep separate from us.

Because the path of mediation is a path back to our own inner monster.

To connect with him and to get to know him a bit better. So that he no longers drives us.

So that we can finally work together and integrate him.

Comment

Share

Creating Safer Group & Community Experiences

Comment

Share

Creating Safer Group & Community Experiences

I've been considering the intersection of intentions/agreements/connections as a way to create a field that continues to hold people and their experience long after events, workshops, parties, retreats, trainings--in a particular light and trajectory, ideally in a way that is supportive, sovereign, loving, and growthful.

If these three "subfields" aren't strong enough together in concert/collaboration with each other, participants who don't feel validated and held in their experience in the current field might decide to move to another field (of intentions/agreements/connections) if this new field seems to be better able to hold their experiences and support them in making sense of them safely.

However, this can also cause people to reinterpret their experiences in a way that occurs as more harmful or look from that new field into the old field in a way that seems more harmful.

And fair enough, whichever field they land on will seem to be the one which is the best/safest/truest/most accurate.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Share

Request Languaging: Knowing how to ask makes a difference

Comment

Share

Request Languaging: Knowing how to ask makes a difference

How do you make requests? How do you engage another person with your needs, desires, or ideas in a way that allows them to find their own way and avoid feeling undue pressure if they are more agreeable than you or if you have more power/rank than they have? How do you ensure that an engagement is fully consensual (ready, willing, able, informed) in the face of the nuances of how you relate with another person?

Here's a few examples. Take a moment to feel how each of these would occur on someone else or on you depending on who the other person is and who you are in relationship to them:

Click the title to read the rest.

Comment

Share

Do You Know How to Have a Clearing Conversation?

Comment

Share

Do You Know How to Have a Clearing Conversation?

Clearing conversations, AKA Repair Conversations (at least for smaller issues) or Mediated Conversations (for the bigger issues) are crucial to maintain relationships of all types and levels as they support arising issues, difficulties, and challenges people may have with each other by creating a space for feelings/emotions, projections, thoughts, feedback, stories, request, boundaries, etc to be expressed cleanly by the giver with the greatest chance of being heard by the receiver.

Over time, without these types of conversations (or the ability for either or both people to integrate them into something real rather than imagined, relationship will slowly (or quickly) deteriorate. One only has to look at their closest relationships to understand how easily it is to make things up about someone else, their needs, their desires, their personality, their fears, their qualities and faults, etc to see the natural propensity for humans to fill in the blanks of their knowing and understanding about someone else and begin to believe their own thoughts more strongly than leaving an open empty question about this person.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Share

About Classic Moral Trap Memes

Comment

Share

About Classic Moral Trap Memes

believe, and are now looking for ways to test their new toy.

So what do you do about this?

Don't walk into the trap. It's only for you if you get caught. 

Add "It is my personal opinion that..." in front of their meme to understand that it's not objective truth. 

Also many memes assume something to be true just because it's in the meme, so if you show up and speak otherwise, you just became the target audience for the "denier" of the meme, which will then expose you to a similar trap.

Take a look at the second meme, which, when spelled out, looks like this:

"If you need an illustration of white privilege (ie you're one of those people who need it), and don't think you have privilege, then you needing this illustration is your white privilege talking (and it might also show your fragility for good measure)."

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Share

How to Share Responsibility / Accountability  and Avoid Conflict

Comment

Share

How to Share Responsibility / Accountability and Avoid Conflict

(Note: In this conversation I will use responsibility to also mean accountability)

For this game we take a whole new look at the conversation around the topic of Responsibility and its role in conflict. Clear your mind of what you know and dive in.

In relationship or any engagement between adults, responsibility is usually something that is shared (to some degree) between all parties involved.

Imagine responsibility as something that can be measured in terms of “quantity”. When responsibility is taken for everything that happens in the engagement/relationship, everyone knows the part they play and to what degree they affect the outcome. Generally, this means everyone is happy in the engagement and there's little conflict: I cook, you do the dishes. You want more touch, you tell me and I respond with more touch. I drive and you navigate. If I'm unhappy, I share with you about it and you know where you can rise up because it's your responsibility. Or you can refuse and I can take responsibility.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Share

Pressure: What influences us when we receive a request?

Comment

Share

Pressure: What influences us when we receive a request?

Recently, I had a conversation with a group of friends about the idea that in interactions and specifically requests made by one person towards another, there were various categories of "pressure" felt by the person receiving the request, and influenced at various degrees by the person making the request.

This pressure, mainly, serves to overcome, achieve, or reach consent, meaning it influences someone’s level of readiness, willingness, ability, or information about the nature of the engagement towards the possibility of them consenting to the engagement.

Achieving consent isn't necessarily *bad*: it can look like encouraging/supporting someone who isn't yet a "yes" by giving them what they might need to get there, as a team effort with them in that decision process. And, it can also be one-sided (for the asker who is only focused on/caring for themselves or on the other, or for the person being asked especially if the asker is coming from a place of people pleasing.

(Click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Share

Specialness: The power of choosing and being chosen

Comment

Share

Specialness: The power of choosing and being chosen

I think the quote below is great.

And, it fails to acknowledge the deep need many people have to be chosen, to be someone else's top choice.

Some say "I choose myself first" and fair enough, they do, and everyone else comes second.

Some choose (or nature does) their child(ren).

Some choose their pet.

Some choose their partner.

Some choose each moment, each engagement, each bite of food they ingest.

We forget the power of choosing and being chosen.

(click the title to read more)

Comment

Share

Why Cultivating Your "Yes" is The Core of Sovereignty

Comment

Share

Why Cultivating Your "Yes" is The Core of Sovereignty

In consent work, it's common to say that consent means someone is ready, willing, able, and informed.

However, what if the only thing missing is someone being *willing*? What if they are ready, able, and informed, but something is still stopping them.

What has someone be willing (or not) to engage in a particular way?

I believe this is where we enter the realm of "free-will" (and of course, the phrase gives it away)

At first glance, you would expect everyone to have free-will and be able to make their own choices--choices which, ostensibly, would feel good and have a positive impact on their life.

But if you look deeper, you'll immediately see that this isn't always the case: people only make choices that are GOOD for them (ie have an effectively positive impact on their life) and perhaps ALSO feel good--or make some level of PAIN and SUFFERING go away.

And so if they lack enough perspective or feelings to make a better choice, they won't.

Why is that? I have a few thoughts...

(click the title to read more)

Comment

Share

Personal Responsibility: Is it for you?

Comment

Share

Personal Responsibility: Is it for you?

For this exploration and inquiry we dive into the realm of (personal) responsibility. What does it take to take responsibility for all things that happen to us? Is it even possible? Does it even make sense? And when we fail, can we take responsibility for *that* too? In transformational circles, many people believe that taking 100% responsibility is not only possible but also *desired*. But what happens when something happens and we just can't take personal responsibility, no matter how much we try? Conflict is often the result. Read on below for the various scenarios possible between two people when impactful words or actions are shared, and then find someone to explore these scenarios with in conversation.

Click the title to read the rest.

Comment

Share

What is Reality Cuddling?

Comment

Share

What is Reality Cuddling?

Think of the last time you cuddled with someone. What happened in the seconds and minutes that followed the call to cuddle? Was it smooth, awkward, quick, slow, weird? Did it feel comfy, edgy, scary, good, bad, etc? How many times did it take to really feel the two of you coming together gracefully? How many times did it take for the two of you to learn to do it perfectly and effortlessly?

So there's this thing we do when we meet someone new and decide that we want to connect with them more deeply, more intimately, which is very similar to cuddling. It involves bringing their sense of reality together with ours, which means their preferences, their morality, their perspective, their fears, their experience, and much much more, together with ours for the purpose of reaching a certain level of coherence and shared reality.

Click the title to read the rest.

Comment

Share

The Rising of the King

Comment

Share

The Rising of the King

Recently I was chatting with a friend about the difference between the PRINCE and KING archetypes.

Here's the thing about archetypes: they are not *real*, but much like a map can give us a sense of what is out there around us, archetypes give us a sense of what is possible in terms of *how* we engage with the world.

Archetypes have been around almost forever, ever since humans were able to imagine gods and demons and spirits, each embodying the epitome of something we can only aspire to become, each giving us a sense of what is POSSIBLE.

And as archetypes developed over the thousands of years of our history, and as humans have tried to rise up to the occasion they present and look like them, archetypes began too to look like us, showing us more nuanced and refined version of what men and women COULD look like, giving us male and female archetypes.

This is where the archetype of the King, Warrior, Magician, and Lover (from Roger Moore's book of the same name) came from. Again, these are not REAL, but to a degree, we often behave AS IF they are, or at least as something to imitate, giving us guidelines for behavior, and a sense of morality: values to aspire to and develop so we can become more aware, secure, and mature.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Share

The Challenge of Emotionally Balancing with Others

2 Comments

Share

The Challenge of Emotionally Balancing with Others

Trying to emotionally balance on someone who is trying to do the same thing with you will usually lead to a very challenging balancing act.

This is normal.

Ever seen two acrobats balancing on each other? There’s usually a “base” and a “flyer”. There’s never two bases or two flyers balancing on each other.

The same is true emotionally with two people. It’s always much wiser to have a base (the most emotionally balanced partner) and a flyer (the person exploring their emotions) at any one time.

For three people, you’ll notice that in a counseling/therapy situation, the practitioner will always be a version of a “base” and the partners will either be a combination of base/flyer or flyer/flyer.

In other words, it’s CRUCIAL that there be enough balance in the system (either using at least one partner or one practitioner as the base) for a volatile/challenging situation to not become too dangerous.

Again, same as with partner acrobatics.

(click the title to read the rest)

2 Comments

Share

Growing a More Secure Attachment Style

Comment

Share

Growing a More Secure Attachment Style

Essentially growing a more secure attachment style comes down to create a stable life with stable relationships as well as increasing your inner stability through practices that support it:

- embodied practice (yoga/meditation/exercise)
- reducing addictive behavior (drugs/coffee/porn/etc)
- reducing clutter/distractions
- increasing self-esteem (the book "The Six Pillars of Self-Esteem" is great and has practices in it too)

Also you can look at increasing stability in 7 different areas:

- Physical (good/enough sleep/food/water/exercise)
- Spiritual (good/enough meditation, prayer, ritual)
- Somatic (good/enough movement, dance, etc practice that involve the 4 pillars of embodiment: touch, movement, sound, breath)
- Emotional (good/enough solid/secure/fulfilling/supportive/connection with friends/family/mentors/allies who are themselves preferably secure. Therapy is an example of a secure relationship with mentorship)
- Social (good/enough interactions with peers/community that make you feel connected to the world so you don’t isolate)
- Primal (good/enough engagements with nature and the world that allow you to feel and feed your inner animal)
- Intellectual (good/enough reading/conversations/learning that allow you to know yourself and others better over time)

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Share

Attachment Theory & Non-monogamy

Comment

Share

Attachment Theory & Non-monogamy

As I've been exploring Attachment Theory, I've been wondering how it applies to open relationships, polyamory, and non-monogamy.

AVOIDANT: People with an avoidant (insecure) attachment style tend to want less emotional intimacy and are particularly skilled at deactivating their attachment system. In a non-monogamous community, this would make them the ones who can most easily play the field without really getting attached/entwined, the most picky (especially for the fearful-avoidant subtype), the least likely to fall in love, and the most desiring to "not make long term commitments".

ANXIOUS: People with an anxious (insecure) attachment style tend to go for more (emotional) intimacy as a way to keep their attachment style constantly activated. You can see them as the non-stop passionate lover. In a non-monogamous community, this would make them the most likely to repeatedly fall in love, to have multiple lovers, and to have/create the most drama in their relationships. But because anxious also often means very focused on a single person, it might also mean this attachment style will have the hardest time with their person having other lovers.

(click the title to read the rest)

Comment

Share

Secure Behavior Creates Better Flow

Comment

Share

Secure Behavior Creates Better Flow

As someone learns to become secure, they also learn to get their needs met with more foresight.

This makes secure people much less likely to need to be "in flow" to keep their needs met because they actually create flow with a much greater range into the future.

But for those who are insecure, there is a need to first feel that they are allowed to have needs and discern these needs first before they can validate these needs and feel into these needs moment to moment. And then, over time, they learn to extend their foresight and self-care into the future to know what they will need and when they will need it. So over time they will become more and more reliable, needing less and less last minute changes in their engagements, for they will be able to plan ahead and set their life up so it will simply *work*

So if you have someone in your life who constantly seems to change their mind or cancel or alter engagements, just know that they are on the path to becoming more secure, and that this path is paved with met and unmet needs as they learn to engage with their life, their body, their heart, and their animal more effectively.

Comment

Share

How We Avoid Owning Our Shadows

Comment

Share

How We Avoid Owning Our Shadows

Shadow work seems simple yet it is uncannily complex.

Wherever you see UNLOVE in the world is the place where you are doing shadow work.

This is usually a place inside of you that lacks awareness, lacks security, or lacks maturity.

In a way, it's a place inside of you that lacks integration.

As such, you engage the outside world with your misgivings, your reactions, your avoidance, your outrage, your pain, and your suffering because it seems easier than engaging with the parts inside of you that are in pain, that are dismissed, that isn't getting the attention it needs.

(click the ticle to read more)

Comment

Share